Thursday, December 09, 2004
THE WELL DEFINED PENIS
IF YOU'RE SKITTISH, EXCITABLE, OR SQUEAMISH, HERE'S YOUR LAST CHANCE TO HIT THE ALT/LEFT ARROW BUTTONS to escape...OK, BYE.......
Ok, back to the matter at hand: PENIS SIZE
How does one determine the gradation of size in the first place? When does the average penis become "small"; when does average become "normal"; what circumstances occur to define a member introduced as "above average" or "large"?
As a young man, I was made aware of gradations by the following example of the noun hip. An average hip was a hip. A small hip was a hippie. A large hip was a hippo. You get the picture. So obviously a small penis is a "dickie" Everyone knows a "dick" is a dick. But what is an above average dick? A "dicko"? No, I believe the purveyors of turpitude had to invent a whole new "concept" word: "cock". It has a much more threatening overtone, consonantly speaking, when compared with the much more delicate "weenie". The question is then begged: at what point does a lowly dick reach the pinnacle of manhood? Excellent question.
How much emotion/fervor/stimulation is required to remake average into above par?
How much propping of male ego is required to extend the limits of imagination to
more creatively define average just a LITTLE beyond the line and into the "concept" arena?
How excited/engorged must a man become before being allowed membership into the much vaunted haute monde club?
How much does it cost to stay for a week??? Month? etc..Are there group rates?
And the most important question: WHO determines average? Compared to what?
How many averages has the determined determiner sampled?
How many larges has the determiner sampled? Notice there's no question regarding
how many smalls has the determiner sampled. Can bribery affect the truth?
How does one know? One man's prize is another man's torment. Is size in the
"eye"(?)of the beholder. Does emotion wreak havoc on objective description?
How can a dickie trick a chickie into thinking its really a 'cock'? Drugs?? E??
How is this all resolved? Weight lifting??Excessive work habits??Alcohol??God??
I saw an interesting show on sexuality and the opening scene was of a woman with an ample bosom exhibiting a good bit of cleavage. The interesting part was that it was in fact not a bosom but a derriere! Fooled everyone. But the point the producer was making was that prior to the time women became 'upright' the prominent feature of allure was the behind. And only after this stand up development did natural selection create the concept of mammaries as a fixation of attraction. Fortunately natural selection had enough sense to keep exquisite derrieres available for a goodly portion of the population whose development has remained "behind".
Here's the rub: I have noticed for years that large breasted women are generally underendowed in the "ass" department. Conversely, women who are less endowed in the "boob" department make up for it with bounteous "cheek-cleavage". The cruel thing it seems, is that for men, there apparently is no counter-balance. Its not as if a small penis has had natural selection opt for square jaw compensation; or a weak chin automatically points to a large penis. (otherwise you might see a lot of gorgeous women on the arms of the weaker chinned) Although, baldness HAS recently been shown to be the direct effect of excessive testosterone. Check that out - get back to us.
Again God has managed to insert a cruel twist of fate with women. Not only is there NOT a definitive method of determining categorically what possible gift a potential suitor has stashed in his basket, women (not all) are further constrained by the necessity of loving said suitor BEFORE they even allow themselves to sample the goods.
With self-deception and polite duplicity as handmaidens, war cannot be far behind.
Ok, back to the matter at hand: PENIS SIZE
How does one determine the gradation of size in the first place? When does the average penis become "small"; when does average become "normal"; what circumstances occur to define a member introduced as "above average" or "large"?
As a young man, I was made aware of gradations by the following example of the noun hip. An average hip was a hip. A small hip was a hippie. A large hip was a hippo. You get the picture. So obviously a small penis is a "dickie" Everyone knows a "dick" is a dick. But what is an above average dick? A "dicko"? No, I believe the purveyors of turpitude had to invent a whole new "concept" word: "cock". It has a much more threatening overtone, consonantly speaking, when compared with the much more delicate "weenie". The question is then begged: at what point does a lowly dick reach the pinnacle of manhood? Excellent question.
How much emotion/fervor/stimulation is required to remake average into above par?
How much propping of male ego is required to extend the limits of imagination to
more creatively define average just a LITTLE beyond the line and into the "concept" arena?
How excited/engorged must a man become before being allowed membership into the much vaunted haute monde club?
How much does it cost to stay for a week??? Month? etc..Are there group rates?
And the most important question: WHO determines average? Compared to what?
How many averages has the determined determiner sampled?
How many larges has the determiner sampled? Notice there's no question regarding
how many smalls has the determiner sampled. Can bribery affect the truth?
How does one know? One man's prize is another man's torment. Is size in the
"eye"(?)of the beholder. Does emotion wreak havoc on objective description?
How can a dickie trick a chickie into thinking its really a 'cock'? Drugs?? E??
How is this all resolved? Weight lifting??Excessive work habits??Alcohol??God??
I saw an interesting show on sexuality and the opening scene was of a woman with an ample bosom exhibiting a good bit of cleavage. The interesting part was that it was in fact not a bosom but a derriere! Fooled everyone. But the point the producer was making was that prior to the time women became 'upright' the prominent feature of allure was the behind. And only after this stand up development did natural selection create the concept of mammaries as a fixation of attraction. Fortunately natural selection had enough sense to keep exquisite derrieres available for a goodly portion of the population whose development has remained "behind".
Here's the rub: I have noticed for years that large breasted women are generally underendowed in the "ass" department. Conversely, women who are less endowed in the "boob" department make up for it with bounteous "cheek-cleavage". The cruel thing it seems, is that for men, there apparently is no counter-balance. Its not as if a small penis has had natural selection opt for square jaw compensation; or a weak chin automatically points to a large penis. (otherwise you might see a lot of gorgeous women on the arms of the weaker chinned) Although, baldness HAS recently been shown to be the direct effect of excessive testosterone. Check that out - get back to us.
Again God has managed to insert a cruel twist of fate with women. Not only is there NOT a definitive method of determining categorically what possible gift a potential suitor has stashed in his basket, women (not all) are further constrained by the necessity of loving said suitor BEFORE they even allow themselves to sample the goods.
With self-deception and polite duplicity as handmaidens, war cannot be far behind.
Comments:
<< Home
to repsond as a female. i would say that for a normal female it comes down to this: memory fails you. unless you are sleeping with a bunch of men at the same time, it's pretty hard to get a real handle on penis size. (no pun intended). usually, time elapses between partners in life, sometimes too much time, and by the next guy, it's sort of hard to remember exactly how big your hand was to the last guy's dick, or how big his body was compared to his penis (that can skew perception a little - a small dick on a small guy looks normal, but the same size on a big guy looks puny.) and when you guage it all by how it felt, it's really hard to subtract all of the other stuff that happens in sex. there are the exceptionally large penis, and i think you know you have one if it takes some effort and time to get totally penetrated without hurting a woman. (that may be a good measure). most of the time when men ask if they are big compared to others, it honestly is a difficult question to answer because most dicks are the same size, maybe not in actuality, but definitely in the imperfect memory of a woman.
# posted by 
: 10:00 AM
: 10:00 AM
I think thats a good assessment.
Hear that you ruler totin' dudes?!?!
Just be happy you're gettin laid. 'Cause the more you focus on your self the more you miss out on experiencing whats going between you and your partner - and that's when the fun begins.
Hear that you ruler totin' dudes?!?!
Just be happy you're gettin laid. 'Cause the more you focus on your self the more you miss out on experiencing whats going between you and your partner - and that's when the fun begins.
Yeah I hate that not being able to penetrate thing...
and before I forget -
guys, can we get a big hand for
"the imperfect memory of a woman"?
:)
and before I forget -
guys, can we get a big hand for
"the imperfect memory of a woman"?
:)
I have to respectfully disagree with anonymous. A woman with any amount of experience certainly knows what she is dealing with when presented with the subject at hand. Now what I will say is that while we know what we are dealing with, it is not the end all or be all if that "well defined penis" is not so well defined.
With the exception of extremes, such as a penis so small that it would be compared to a pencil, or one so large that it instills a little fear in the woman...I agree with anonymous that most men are simply average (with minor movement up and down the penis scale) just as most people are average in looks. (Btw, I disagree with you too regarding the big boobs/no ass/small boobs/nice ass theory too, but that's a topic for another day.)
Anyway, the thing that men ALWAYS need to keep in mind is that we DON'T REALLY CARE about the size (with the exception of extremes) because all the intangibles that come into play while "playing" are what make the play enjoyable. It's all about what the man does with what he has (large or not) that impacts the woman...sheer size??? Who cares!
Post a Comment
With the exception of extremes, such as a penis so small that it would be compared to a pencil, or one so large that it instills a little fear in the woman...I agree with anonymous that most men are simply average (with minor movement up and down the penis scale) just as most people are average in looks. (Btw, I disagree with you too regarding the big boobs/no ass/small boobs/nice ass theory too, but that's a topic for another day.)
Anyway, the thing that men ALWAYS need to keep in mind is that we DON'T REALLY CARE about the size (with the exception of extremes) because all the intangibles that come into play while "playing" are what make the play enjoyable. It's all about what the man does with what he has (large or not) that impacts the woman...sheer size??? Who cares!
# posted by : 7:55 PM
: 7:55 PM<< Home
